Writing

AI, work, and human responsibility.

Change is continuous. Evolution flows in front of our eyes whether we like it or not — in how we work, how we spend our free time, what we expect from the systems around us. Right now, the challenge has a name: a new generation of AI tools that are quietly rewriting assumptions we thought were stable.

But no technological transition has ever settled without confronting a radical social shift. Because, in the end, it is people who use technologies, who integrate with them, who decide what to keep and what to leave behind. The tools change fast. The people who use them change differently — slower, more resistant, more deeply.

I decided to stay current. Not as a spectator, but as someone who navigates these changes every day — at work, in the tools I build, in the stories I write. What I find, I share: reflections, observations, contradictions. Not because I have answers, but because thinking in public is itself a form of growth — and because moving forward together is the only version of progress that actually holds.

All writing

Read all on Substack ↗
If Homer Had Been an AI, Would Ulysses Have Become Immortal?

If Homer Had Been an AI, Would Ulysses Have Become Immortal?

What if tomorrow, instead of searching for a novel to read, all we had to do was write a prompt and have it generated instantly?

Stupidity as the Engine of Corporate Life

Stupidity as the Engine of Corporate Life

From NASA to open spaces: how the Normalization of Deviance and Groupthink turn competence into collective stupidity.

Am I Faster Than Innovation?

Am I Faster Than Innovation?

AI evolves every 4 months. Companies decide in 5 years.

On Substack

When AI Tells You You’re Right… and You’re Actually Wrong

One of the less discussed risks of AI tools: the systematic reinforcement of your own assumptions. A practical look at how to work with AI without losing critical thinking.

Read on Substack ↗